| Roger's tits | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
bitchcraft Potential 00 Agent
Posts : 3372 Member Since : 2011-03-28 Location : I know........I know
| |
| |
tiffanywint Potential 00 Agent
Posts : 3675 Member Since : 2011-03-16 Location : making mudpies
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Fri Apr 06, 2012 4:31 am | |
| LALD was a huge box-office hit. It went over big. I don't think Rog had much to do with it though, although he was well known from the Saint and Persuaders. I think it was perceived as a solid continuation of the Bond formula. I know it was popular with us kids. I saw it opening day matinee in theatre. It was my first new-release Bond. I probably saw it at least 5-6 more times on both single-release and double bills with TMWTGG. We couldn't get enough of it; Sheriff Pepper, the chases, the costumes, the crazy villains, the lair, the music. The girls were better in the next one though, Golden Gun, which hit theatres a year and a half later. I rember being enthralled with both Adams and Ekland - to this day my favourite Bond-girl one-two punch.
Plus we knew David Hedison from Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea re-runs.
Rosie, was yes kind of annoying. Solitaire wasn't very interesting either. I remember being fascinated by the crocs. No matter how many times I saw the film, I was so relieved when Rog managed to get off that croc island. Whew. Hi-lite of the movie though was the boat-chase. We'd go bananas at the featured boat jump scene.
Bond had no rivals in 1973. There was nothing else like it in cinema. Rog got the job done. We were happy! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:36 am | |
| Like that heading, Dog. 'Roger's Tit's' may well be the preferred title of my novel, so far 25 years in the writing. |
|
| |
j7wild Head of Station
Posts : 2038 Member Since : 2011-09-10
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:45 am | |
| IMO Worst Bond Film ever!! |
|
| |
Blunt Instrument 00 Agent
Posts : 6227 Member Since : 2011-03-20 Location : Propping up the bar
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:50 pm | |
| I remember someone (possibly unkindly) saying of the bed scene with Magda in Octopussy 'When your leading man's chest is bigger than the lady's that he's in bed with, it may be time to re-cast'. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:54 pm | |
| At least Roger got them into bed. Craig doesn't know the meaning of Rogering. |
|
| |
Blunt Instrument 00 Agent
Posts : 6227 Member Since : 2011-03-20 Location : Propping up the bar
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:56 pm | |
| There's a potential 3 in Skyfall.
And I'm not including Dench in that. |
|
| |
tiffanywint Potential 00 Agent
Posts : 3675 Member Since : 2011-03-16 Location : making mudpies
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Sat Apr 07, 2012 5:29 am | |
| - j7wild wrote:
- IMO Worst Bond Film ever!!
Bite me! |
|
| |
David Schofield Universal Exports
Posts : 80 Member Since : 2011-09-08
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:04 am | |
| - Erica Ambler wrote:
- At least Roger got them into bed. Craig doesn't know the meaning of Rogering.
All that Guardain reading you see. Too indecisve and considering of the consequences to get it up. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:12 am | |
| Ah, the politics of penetration. Less finking, more fucking. |
|
| |
David Schofield Universal Exports
Posts : 80 Member Since : 2011-09-08
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:19 am | |
| Thing is Craig-Bond gives the impression that he'd genuinely consider the Human Rights and how any shagged female might feel afterwards before unzipping. Decide against it and go back and have another white wine spritzer. Even with all the "I only fuck married women" crap in CR.
None of his predecessors had that problem, did they?
Thought I guess much of that could be due to the "curse of the Craig cock". Two films, four F***S, three corpses.
And i understand Dench gets it in SKYFALL.
Still, wouldn't have put Rog off, would it? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:34 am | |
| The Craig films have nothing to do with Bond as far as I'm concerned.
Humourless, dark and joyless, I'd rather pluck out my eyes. |
|
| |
David Schofield Universal Exports
Posts : 80 Member Since : 2011-09-08
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:46 am | |
| - Erica Ambler wrote:
- The Craig films have nothing to do with Bond as far as I'm concerned.
Humourless, dark and joyless, I'd rather pluck out my eyes. Well, while I do feel Craig-Bond has been neutered (gym sessions and tight fitting trunks do not a man make, and there might be something in Craig himself further which doesn't convince as a ladies man), there is much that salvages Craig-Bond and his films, IMO. I reserve plucking my eyes out for Rog's films. Fun, and he seems a nice, if rather fortunate, man. But Fleming-Bond, or remotely close, he isn't. Need a good deal of booze onboard to get through any of 'em. |
|
| |
Blunt Instrument 00 Agent
Posts : 6227 Member Since : 2011-03-20 Location : Propping up the bar
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:46 pm | |
| - David Schofield wrote:
- Thought I guess much of that could be due to the "curse of the Craig cock". Two films, four F***S, three corpses.
4? Vesper and Fields are the only 'confirmed' lays in Craig's movies. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:12 pm | |
| Yeah, I make it two too.
Two too many for Nu Bond.
Heterosexist.. |
|
| |
David Schofield Universal Exports
Posts : 80 Member Since : 2011-09-08
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:56 pm | |
| You are both, of course, quite right. Confusing what should be Craig's batting average with his predecessors.
That's three corpes, two F***S then. And two refusals.
And Dench to follow.
|
|
| |
CJB 00 Agent
Posts : 5500 Member Since : 2011-03-14 Location : 'Straya
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:39 am | |
| - David Schofield wrote:
- Craig's batting average
He stopped doing that after Dench-M told him he'd go blind. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Roger's tits | |
| |
|
| |
| Roger's tits | |
|