These forums may contain mild adult content and are not associated with EON, Sony or any other companies and do not reflect their views.
 
HomeHome  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Share | 
 

 Roger's tits

Go down 
AuthorMessage
bitchcraft
Chief Executive
Chief Executive


Posts : 3099
Member Since : 2011-03-28
Location : I don't know what things will be like in 2 years. I don't have 2020 vision.

PostSubject: Roger's tits    Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:37 am

Came across these, how dandy. Anyone know what feedback was like back in 1973? Bond is an equal-opportunity shagger but Rosie will always be a fucking embarassment to the CIA and your typical bubble-head Bond girl.

Back to top Go down
tiffanywint
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 3675
Member Since : 2011-03-17
Location : making mudpies

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:31 pm

LALD was a huge box-office hit. It went over big. I don't think Rog had much to do with it though, although he was well known from the Saint and Persuaders. I think it was perceived as a solid continuation of the Bond formula. I know it was popular with us kids. I saw it opening day matinee in theatre. It was my first new-release Bond. I probably saw it at least 5-6 more times on both single-release and double bills with TMWTGG. We couldn't get enough of it; Sheriff Pepper, the chases, the costumes, the crazy villains, the lair, the music. The girls were better in the next one though, Golden Gun, which hit theatres a year and a half later. I rember being enthralled with both Adams and Ekland - to this day my favourite Bond-girl one-two punch.

Plus we knew David Hedison from Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea re-runs.

Rosie, was yes kind of annoying. Solitaire wasn't very interesting either. I remember being fascinated by the crocs. No matter how many times I saw the film, I was so relieved when Rog managed to get off that croc island. Whew. Hi-lite of the movie though was the boat-chase. We'd go bananas at the featured boat jump scene.

Bond had no rivals in 1973. There was nothing else like it in cinema. Rog got the job done. We were happy!
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6232
Member Since : 2011-08-05

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:36 pm

Like that heading, Dog. 'Roger's Tit's' may well be the preferred title of my novel, so far 25 years in the writing.
Back to top Go down
j7wild
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2039
Member Since : 2011-09-10

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:45 pm

IMO Worst Bond Film ever!!
Back to top Go down
Blunt Instrument
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 3672
Member Since : 2011-03-20
Location : Belfast, Northern Ireland

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:50 pm

I remember someone (possibly unkindly) saying of the bed scene with Magda in Octopussy 'When your leading man's chest is bigger than the lady's that he's in bed with, it may be time to re-cast'.
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6232
Member Since : 2011-08-05

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:54 pm

At least Roger got them into bed. Craig doesn't know the meaning of Rogering.
Back to top Go down
Blunt Instrument
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 3672
Member Since : 2011-03-20
Location : Belfast, Northern Ireland

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:56 pm

There's a potential 3 in Skyfall.

And I'm not including Dench in that.
Back to top Go down
tiffanywint
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 3675
Member Since : 2011-03-17
Location : making mudpies

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:29 pm

j7wild wrote:
IMO Worst Bond Film ever!!

Bite me!

Back to top Go down
David Schofield
Correspondent
Correspondent
avatar

Posts : 80
Member Since : 2011-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:04 pm

Erica Ambler wrote:
At least Roger got them into bed. Craig doesn't know the meaning of Rogering.

All that Guardain reading you see. Too indecisve and considering of the consequences to get it up.
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6232
Member Since : 2011-08-05

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:12 pm

Ah, the politics of penetration. Less finking, more fucking.
Back to top Go down
David Schofield
Correspondent
Correspondent
avatar

Posts : 80
Member Since : 2011-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:19 pm

Thing is Craig-Bond gives the impression that he'd genuinely consider the Human Rights and how any shagged female might feel afterwards before unzipping. Decide against it and go back and have another white wine spritzer. Even with all the "I only fuck married women" crap in CR.

None of his predecessors had that problem, did they?

Thought I guess much of that could be due to the "curse of the Craig cock". Two films, four F***S, three corpses.

And i understand Dench gets it in SKYFALL.

Still, wouldn't have put Rog off, would it?
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6232
Member Since : 2011-08-05

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:34 pm

The Craig films have nothing to do with Bond as far as I'm concerned.

Humourless, dark and joyless, I'd rather pluck out my eyes.
Back to top Go down
David Schofield
Correspondent
Correspondent
avatar

Posts : 80
Member Since : 2011-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:46 pm

Erica Ambler wrote:
The Craig films have nothing to do with Bond as far as I'm concerned.

Humourless, dark and joyless, I'd rather pluck out my eyes.

Well, while I do feel Craig-Bond has been neutered (gym sessions and tight fitting trunks do not a man make, and there might be something in Craig himself further which doesn't convince as a ladies man), there is much that salvages Craig-Bond and his films, IMO.

I reserve plucking my eyes out for Rog's films. Fun, and he seems a nice, if rather fortunate, man. But Fleming-Bond, or remotely close, he isn't. Need a good deal of booze onboard to get through any of 'em. 🇳🇴
Back to top Go down
Blunt Instrument
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 3672
Member Since : 2011-03-20
Location : Belfast, Northern Ireland

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:46 pm

David Schofield wrote:
Thought I guess much of that could be due to the "curse of the Craig cock". Two films, four F***S, three corpses.

4? Vesper and Fields are the only 'confirmed' lays in Craig's movies.
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6232
Member Since : 2011-08-05

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:12 am

Yeah, I make it two too.

Two too many for Nu Bond.

Heterosexist..
Back to top Go down
David Schofield
Correspondent
Correspondent
avatar

Posts : 80
Member Since : 2011-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:56 am

You are both, of course, quite right. Confusing what should be Craig's batting average with his predecessors.

That's three corpes, two F***S then. And two refusals.

And Dench to follow.

Back to top Go down
CJB
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 4208
Member Since : 2011-03-14
Location : 'Straya

PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:39 pm

David Schofield wrote:
Craig's batting average

He stopped doing that after Dench-M told him he'd go blind.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Roger's tits    

Back to top Go down
 
Roger's tits
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Bond And Beyond :: Bond :: The Bond Films: Reviews, Ratings & Discussion :: Live And Let Die (1973)-
Jump to: