These forums may contain mild adult content and are not associated with EON, Sony or any other companies and do not reflect their views.
 
HomeHome  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Share | 
 

 Hollywoodies.

Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 10 ... 14  Next
AuthorMessage
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 4:16 am

Erica Ambler wrote:
Salomé wrote:
If Ronan Farrow was capable of making dozens of women lie on the record that would make him one of the most powerful men in the media.

That's true. But you can be sure that those who have come forward have something to gain and it might not be justice only. The same article puts it rather well:

Quote :
Here's a certainty: When you play out your personal dramas, hurt and self-interest in the media, it's a confection. You say what you have to say in the way you have to say it to give it media currency – and that's always far from the truth. Often, in fact, someone else says it for you. It's all planned. It's all rehearsed. This is craft. This is strategy. This is manipulation. This is spin.

Well what they have to gain might simply be a form of vengeance?
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6262
Member Since : 2011-08-05
Location : Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein euro

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 4:24 am

Salomé wrote:
Erica Ambler wrote:
Salomé wrote:
If Ronan Farrow was capable of making dozens of women lie on the record that would make him one of the most powerful men in the media.

That's true. But you can be sure that those who have come forward have something to gain and it might not be justice only. The same article puts it rather well:

Quote :
Here's a certainty: When you play out your personal dramas, hurt and self-interest in the media, it's a confection. You say what you have to say in the way you have to say it to give it media currency – and that's always far from the truth. Often, in fact, someone else says it for you. It's all planned. It's all rehearsed. This is craft. This is strategy. This is manipulation. This is spin.

Well what they have to gain might simply be a form of vengeance?

Justice rather than vengeance might be the right word here. Although it's nice to think this was some groundswell of genuine anger, the whole business looks highly coordinated.  

The Steven Seagal stuff is particularly odd as I have vague memories of reading allegations against him around 25 years ago; no one seemed very interested back then. Also, some have argued that Katherine Heigl's career and public image needs rebuilding right now; certainly those pictures are many years old.
Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 5:09 am

I think true justice would require a court other than that of public opinion.

In terms of Heigl, I don't think she was among the women who accused Steven Seagal of predatory behavior, even that talk show bit was very light-hearted in nature.

What you say about Seagal applies to many of the men who have been exposed recently. There had been rumblings about Weinstein and Ratner for a decent amount of time too. I'm not sure why people seem to care more now than they did back then.
Back to top Go down
Blunt Instrument
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 3614
Member Since : 2011-03-20
Location : Belfast, Northern Ireland

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 5:59 am

I see Gal Gadot has said that if Ratner's RatPac production company is involved in any way with the Wonder Woman sequel, she'll walk.
Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:30 am

Blunt Instrument wrote:
I see Gal Gadot has said that if Ratner's RatPac production company is involved in any way with the Wonder Woman sequel, she'll walk.  

It will be interesting to see how WB will respond.
Whilst Gal Gadot is a hot property for them after the huge success of Wonder Woman, WB had a long-term deal with Ratner and his production company was involved in several of their (semi-)recent hits.
I wouldn't be too surprised if Gal Gadot does indeed play hardball that they might opt to cast another actress in the role.
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6262
Member Since : 2011-08-05
Location : Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein euro

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:13 am

Unless DC Entertainment lawyers are incompetent or there's a moral turpitude clause in Ratner's contract, Gadot will be locked down. Does this description fit Brett Ratner?

Quote :
Moral turpitude means, in general, shameful wickedness—so extreme a departure from ordinary standards of honest, good morals, justice, or ethics as to be shocking to the moral sense of the community. It has also been defined as an act of baseness, vileness, or depravity in the private and social duties which one person owes to another, or to society in general, contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between people.

Anyway, I hope some bored sub-editor is going to use Waiting for Gadot as a headline.
Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:17 am

Erica Ambler wrote:
Unless DC Entertainment lawyers are incompetent or there's a moral turpitude clause in Ratner's contract, Gadot will be locked down. Does this description fit Brett Ratner?

Quote :
Moral turpitude means, in general, shameful wickedness—so extreme a departure from ordinary standards of honest, good morals, justice, or ethics as to be shocking to the moral sense of the community. It has also been defined as an act of baseness, vileness, or depravity in the private and social duties which one person owes to another, or to society in general, contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between people.

I guess it all depends on how the world feels about shrimp cocktail blowjobs? wink

In any case, considering that we are on our fifth actor portraying the role of Batman in just the past 25 years (and we might soon get to six if the stories about Ben Affleck wanting out of the role are true), I'm not sure that WB is all too worried about the prospect of possibly having to find a replacement for Gal Gadot.
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6262
Member Since : 2011-08-05
Location : Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein euro

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:22 am

Salomé wrote:
I guess it all depends on how the world feels about shrimp cocktail blowjobs? wink

Hmmm. Seems Brett Ratner does not keep a kosher kitchen.

Can't speak for the rest of the world, but I prefer Nitromors on mine.

Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:38 am

http://defamer.gawker.com/remember-when-38-year-old-jerry-seinfeld-dated-a-17-yea-1714153938

It is interesting that some people have found it necessary to dig up this old story in the context of the wider allegations against supposedly predatory men. I have no opinion either way about Jerry Seinfeld, but it seems nefarious to lump in a seemingly consensual relationship that admittedly does include a significant age difference with the behavior of what are/were clearly predatory men (if the allegations about them are true).
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6262
Member Since : 2011-08-05
Location : Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein euro

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:48 am

The English royal family were partial to teen queens. I demand dem kings be tried in der absence.
Back to top Go down
Hilly KCMG
Moderator
Moderator
avatar

Posts : 5780
Member Since : 2010-05-13
Location : Buckinghamshire

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:15 am

Jerry Lee Lewis married his thirteen year-old cousin didn't he? But he wasn't Hollywood.
Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:47 am

https://www.thecut.com/2017/11/rebecca-traister-on-the-post-weinstein-reckoning.html

I don't agree with everything in this piece, but the author does reveal something that many of the hurrahing feminists are choosing to ignore:

Quote :
A powerful white man losing a job is a death, and don’t be surprised if women wind up punished for the spate of killings.

Many men will absorb the lessons of late 2017 to be not about the threat they’ve posed to women but about the threat that women pose to them. So there will be more — perhaps unconscious — hesitancy about hiring women, less eagerness to invite them to lunch, or send them on work trips with men; men will be warier of mentoring women.

There will be a backlash and that backlash might include otherwise well-meaning men avoiding to work with women just to avoid any possible future accusations.

I the same vein, I noticed a female director on Twitter recently mentioning that a male crew member on a shoot approached her and admitted he was now weary of mentoring young women in his field because it was easy to be perceived as a 'creep'.
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6262
Member Since : 2011-08-05
Location : Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein euro

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:11 am

Salomé wrote:
There will be a backlash and that backlash might include otherwise well-meaning men avoiding to work with women just to avoid any possible future accusations.

That assumes a degree of intelligence and self-preservation most men don't possess. Kathy Gyngell's piece, 'The silence of the males', goes somewhat further:

Quote :
Ever since the outing of serial sexual attacker Harvey Weinstein, men have been on public trial. They have been subjected to an across-the-board character assassination. Innocent until proved guilty in the law maybe, but in the trial by media that’s followed they’ve been presumed guilty without recourse to due process.

One man is dead. Several other men’s reputations, family lives and perhaps their careers too have been irretrievably damaged. But men are silent. They stand accused of sexual harassment en masse; of creating a climate of fear and intimidation in which women have to work, an allegation serious enough for the PM to put it before other business, but they still stay silent.

Where's their protest? Will they not speak out even in self-defence? Not even to condemn the casual conflation of flirtation, inconsequential body-touching or familiar or derogatory comments (all of which women are ‘guilty’ of too) with serious sexual assault?

The silence is deafening. You would think men would be infuriated by the double standards, the aspersion cast on their sex, the myths perpetuated by attention-seeking ‘I too have been abused by ten Tory MPs’ Guardianista female columnists and by the idea that we live in some sort patriarchal theocracy, rather than a society in which women are already on top.

If the silence of the men lays bare one thing, it is the myth of their male privilege. What it reveals is the reverse, an appalling crisis of male confidence. It is not men's masculinity that is toxic but the feminist attack on it.

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/kathy-gyngell-silence-males/
Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:31 am

A bit of an overreaction, that piece. For one thing, I have some issues with the notion that women are already on top in the world. In what area of life, exactly?
Back to top Go down
Santa
Senior Correspondent
avatar

Posts : 707
Member Since : 2011-08-21

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:21 am

Salomé wrote:
A bit of an overreaction, that piece.

I couldn't agree more. Climb down, Gyngell. What a drama queen.
Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:49 am

So now Bryan Cranston is getting grief for merely suggesting that the likes of Weinstein and Spacey might be redeemed and let back into their industry, given time.

It's funny because that is far more likely to happen than either of them being ostracized for perpetuity.

People have very short memories. They seem to have forgotten how utterly destroyed Mel Gibson's career and reputation was at one point, the same man who was nominated for a best director Oscar last year and is getting acting gigs in increasingly bigger movies as well.
Back to top Go down
Hilly KCMG
Moderator
Moderator
avatar

Posts : 5780
Member Since : 2010-05-13
Location : Buckinghamshire

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:05 am

Recall Robin Williams' joking once that Gibson had the misfortune to find the one Jewish Highway patrolman. Now, as you say, look at him.

Way Hollywood is, I wouldn't be surprised to see one of Weinstein or Spacey redeemed.
Back to top Go down
Santa
Senior Correspondent
avatar

Posts : 707
Member Since : 2011-08-21

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:52 am

And now Rocky??? eek oh my! facepalm thumbs down shake head pftt cry more
Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:23 am

I'm surprised that Arnie has gotten out of this unscathed so far.
He did have the nickname of "Octopus" at one time for his wandering hands.
Back to top Go down
FieldsMan
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 4819
Member Since : 2010-05-13
Location : The Alpine Room

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:34 pm

I learned recently that Demi Moore snogged a 14 year old boy back in the 80s. Where have the SJWs gone on that one?



Not that I want a big deal made out of this. Twenty-Demi was incredible - the kid's a lucky lad. But considering all the emphasis on sexual predation in the 80s, this isn't spoken about.
Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:51 pm

What exactly is the context of that kiss?

*edit*

Okay, so this was at a party and she was 19 at the time.
I fail to see the big deal.
Unless we are going to lump all of the college-aged guys who date high school girls into this abuse thing, I don't see how you can equate what Demi Moore is doing there with Roy Moore (which I guess what it is meant as a reaction to?).
Back to top Go down
FieldsMan
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 4819
Member Since : 2010-05-13
Location : The Alpine Room

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:29 am

So because the age gap is closer it's ok for a 19 year old to make advances toward a 14 year old? And because it's at a party it's ok too? Kevin Spacey was at a party also.
Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Sat Nov 18, 2017 10:09 pm

I'm perpetually disappointed at the fact that Lena Dunham is one of the few successful female showrunners and that she is held up as some sort of role model for (young) women. I never liked her, nor her show, but her reaction to the sexual assault accusation within her own writers' room has brought my dislike for her to a new level.



Pretty much this, yeah.
Back to top Go down
Erica Ambler
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 6262
Member Since : 2011-08-05
Location : Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein euro

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Mon Nov 20, 2017 3:25 pm



Back to top Go down
Salomé
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
avatar

Posts : 2991
Member Since : 2011-03-17

PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   Mon Nov 20, 2017 8:35 pm

I believe that's from her follow-up statement in which she was doing damage control.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Hollywoodies.   

Back to top Go down
 
Hollywoodies.
Back to top 
Page 7 of 14Go to page : Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 10 ... 14  Next

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Bond And Beyond :: Beyond :: Film News & Film Discussion-
Jump to: