Bond 25 (2019)

Salomé wrote:

The non-daddy bonds above the line, the cradle robbers below the line.

Nice work - I may cite it in my next treatise on patriarchal scum. And I see Miss BelluCCi has skewed the results for SPECTRE.

BTW, given the recent allegations about Roman Polanski, where would he fit in your graph?

Erica Ambler wrote:

Salomé wrote:

The non-daddy bonds above the line, the cradle robbers below the line.

Nice work - I may cite it in my next treatise on patriarchal scum. And I see Miss BelluCCi has skewed the results for SPECTRE.

BTW, given the recent allegations about Roman Polanski, where would he fit in your graph?

That was actually Léa! I only counted the main Bond girls for each movie.

Polanski is almost literally a cradle robber.

I have to say that I find it odd that so many men are falling in the wake of Weinstein.
There have been countless stories about Terry Richardson for at least 5-7 years, but only now is he being formally disavowed by some magazines?

Salomé wrote:

Erica Ambler wrote:

I see Miss BelluCCi has skewed the results for SPECTRE[/b].

That was actually Léa! I only counted the main Bond girls for each movie.

Hmmm. I need the raw data.

Salomé wrote:

There have been countless stories about Terry Richardson for at least 5-7 years, but only now is he being formally disavowed by some magazines?

Yeah, the stories about Richardson go back long before that. There was some rumpus about the work he did for Hamnett back in the late 1990s.

A Typically Terry moment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Awqb_7BdTJ4

Bollocks. Really need that edit button back.

Not wanting to be critical of another woman's body, but her body shape is unusual for a large-breasted individual. She has almost no hip-to-waist ratio to speak of. As a rule, you'd expect at least a semblance of a hour-glass figure.

Don't put Kate under the knife, Sabs, please...

In breaking news (four years ago), George HW Bush, 93, has been accused off pinching a woman's bum. Really, this is too much - Andrea Dworkin was right.

Men are unspeakable pigs. Kill 'em all and let the Goddess decide.

I can understand not enjoying being pinched in the bum by a 93-year old man, but calling it sexual assault is a bit much.

I'm not suggesting plastic surgery for the girl in your video, I'm just amazed that a large-breasted woman who is in good shape doesn't have wider hips.

Salomé wrote:

I'm not suggesting plastic surgery for the girl in your video, I'm just amazed that a large-breasted woman who is in good shape doesn't have wider hips.

As BaB's resident eugenicist, is this performance more to your satisfaction?

I like the bear dancing. On the hot coal.

Erica Ambler wrote:

In breaking news (four years ago), George HW Bush, 93, has been accused off pinching a woman's bum.

Everyone's so desperate to be a victim these days that they'll drag a 93 year old WWII veteran through the mud.

Fuck everything.

Also, Kate Upton's bone-crushing melons make up for any shape issues.

Salomé wrote:

Is it just me or does he really look his age (and then some) in that picture? I know he has always appeared older than his age.

Exactly. He doesn't even look as good as Moore in AVTAK.

FieldsMan wrote:

Salomé wrote:

Is it just me or does he really look his age (and then some) in that picture? I know he has always appeared older than his age.

Exactly. He doesn't even look as good as Moore in AVTAK.

Cregg also doesn't look he has the stamina or inclination to fuck a blonde in an iceberg-submarine all the way from Siberia to Alaska.

CJB wrote:

FieldsMan wrote:

Salomé wrote:

Is it just me or does he really look his age (and then some) in that picture? I know he has always appeared older than his age.

Exactly. He doesn't even look as good as Moore in AVTAK.

Cregg also doesn't look he has the stamina or inclination to fuck a blonde in an iceberg-submarine all the way from Siberia to Alaska.

On that note, I see that Léa Seydoux is set to star in a movie treatment of the Kursk disaster.

Erica Ambler wrote:

Salomé wrote:

I'm not suggesting plastic surgery for the girl in your video, I'm just amazed that a large-breasted woman who is in good shape doesn't have wider hips.

As BaB's resident eugenicist, is this performance more to your satisfaction?

I'd fuck her.

Santa wrote:

I'd fuck her.

How many times do I have to tell you that big jugs aren’t everything? I mean, look at Kate's hips. Not nearly wide enough.

It appears that Christoph Waltz may not be returning as Blofeld in Bond 25.

http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2017/10/28/christoph-waltz-not-returning-for-bond-25

I guess that's a promising start, though I have this feeling that they will retcon the damage done in SPECTRE. 

I also guess that means Blofeld is back. But as that article suggests, he could also be lying, since he notoriously denied playing Blofeld in the lead up to SPECTRE's release.

Wouldn't necessarily read too much into it. If he's legitimately not returning, why would he be party to script details?

Also FMD at the article writer's suggestion that the next Bond villain be the POTUS. Go watch some liberal-affirming dirge starring Matt Affleck or Ben Damon and leave Bond out of your 4-8 year Trumpwhine.

FieldsMan wrote:

But as that article suggests, he could also be lying, since he notoriously denied playing Blofeld in the lead up to SPECTRE's release.

Sadly that is also a possibility. EON could already have him in the fold and are wanting to pull their usual stupid "gotcha" game with something even the most inept of film-goers could put together.

If EON focused more on the writing and less on PR it might save Craig's tenure. As it stands they are  good at neither.

FieldsMan wrote:

If EON focused more on the writing and less on PR it might save Craig's tenure. As it stands they are  good at neither.

Only if it wrote him out just before the pts!

My hopes for Bond 25 being good are limited. It's pretty clear that DC is only returning for the huge paycheck. Even with a good screenplay, we will be watching an actor who is doing the acting equivalent of closing his eyes and thinking of the money.

Curves for B25 Campaign

CJB wrote:

Wouldn't necessarily read too much into it. If he's legitimately not returning, why would he be party to script details?

Also FMD at the article writer's suggestion that the next Bond villain be the POTUS. Go watch some liberal-affirming dirge starring Matt Affleck or Ben Damon and leave Bond out of your 4-8 year Trumpwhine.

Waltz lied, as did Harris, about who they were truly playing, so yeah, his word is worth a warm bucket of spit.

In fact, none of what he said makes any sense. If they're bringing Blofeld back, even I would want Waltz back (though I'd prefer they just drop the whole thing, since they've royally screwed up the character). I honestly don't see the studio recasting Blofeld, and there is no "tradition" of recasting Blofeld (he pulled that out of his arse).

You have to wonder why Babs and Michael are even bothering at this point. The series is worth plenty; someone out there would buy it from them. BOND25 seems like the equivalent of pity-sex: just going through the motions but no real feeling behind it.

The older I've gotten, the more I've come to appreciate the pre-Craig films. They just wanted to entertain. You know, it didn't used to be this dramatic to make a Bond movie...or this long, either. Maybe Thor:Ragnarok will spark a trend and Hollywood will reverse this trend of moribund, henpecked,socially-conscious heroes.

If there was ever a time to do a retro-Bond it's now. Our culture needs to have the piss taken out of it, and Bond is just the man to do it.