Biological Father & Daughter Dating

http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/01/what-its-like-to-date-your-dad.html


   

Part way through this article I'm thinking: 'this has got to be a joke. Someone's winding me up...having a laugh. Maybe it's meant as erotic fiction' But DAY-UM!!! This article is for real! And the father and daughter are biological, not merely related by marriage, but by biology.

It's disgusting. It's revolting. And every single argument for people who are "pro marriage equality" should also apply to this father/daughter who are attempting to get married. If the new standard in marriage is that "love is love" and not strictly the domain of two non-related people of opposite genders, then it's hard to argue that this young lady and her father should not be allowed to marry. I had to stop reading about 1/3rd of the way through. It's sickening.


Someone please tell me this article was, like The Rolling Stone article about the UVA frat "rape", purely made up and is all fiction. Please, please, please tell me this article was meant to troll and is in no way the real thing.

Hey, the pharaohs used to bonk their own daughters to keep royalty pure and in the family.

Which is why Tut was born deformed, his mom and dad were siblings.

Gives new meaning to the word 'mummy'

bitchcraft wrote:

Gives new meaning to the word 'mummy'

Let them. Marriage has always been a joke anyway. And gays should be allowed to get married too, for no other reason than to offend religious folks with sticks up their arses.

Makeshift Python wrote:

Let them. Marriage has always been a joke anyway. And gays should be allowed to get married too, for no other reason than to offend religious folks with sticks up their arses.

What about people who aren't religious, but secularists who believe the effects of allowing a father and daughter to marry would be catastrophic to any sort of normal society? Should a father and son be allowed to marry?

Sure.

Makeshift Python wrote:

Sure.

Hey, at least you are ideologically consistent.

And so am I.

I was thinking this story will be warmly greeted in the Deep South, but then again maybe they prefer to not put an 'official' spin on fucking their blood relatives. I honestly don't know.

Quote :

Is he physically your type?

Definitely. He’s alternative and has piercings and tattoos.

Yeah, that tells me everything I need to know about these oddballs.

He's alternative.

CJB wrote:

Quote :

Is he physically your type?

Definitely. He’s alternative and has piercings and tattoos.

Yeah, that tells me everything I need to know about these oddballs.

He's alternative.

Some commenters are skeptical of the article; specifically, I'm skeptical of the girl. Her answers seem too polished and eloquent for an 18 year old, as if the reporter heavily prepped her or edited the article to make her seem more reasoned, stable, and thoughtful than she really is. The article feels like it is pushing an agenda; a narrative. Either that, or the reporter has read one too many V.C. Andrews novels.

She fucks her dad, who knows what her deal is.

The amusing thing about so many of your views, Gravity, is how much they have in common with the people you profess to detest - Islamic fundamentalist and feminists for instance. You could form a grand alliance.  Always been the way with totalitarianism, though - for instance, communism and fascism has 99.9% common dna.

Would it be too much to suggest that consenting adults be allowed to decide - for good or bad - for themselves?

Erica Ambler wrote:

The amusing thing about so many of your views, Gravity, is how much they have in common with the people you profess to detest - Islamic fundamentalist and feminists for instance. You could form a grand alliance.  Always been the way with totalitarianism, though - for instance, communism and fascism has 99.9% common dna.

Would it be too much to suggest that consenting adults be allowed to decide - for good or bad - for themselves?

I breathe air, drink water, and generally urinate 3-4 times a day, so I guess that means I have something in common with President Obama, no?


Only at BOND AND BEYOND could you express a revulsion for a man and his 18 year old daughter having sex and getting married and ended up being the one who is criticized as intolerant, fascist, and "fundamentalist".

I have really nothing in common with Islamic Fundamentalists: my wife can drive a car. She can go out to the grocery store without a male escort. She can hold down a job not inside the home. Her testimony in court is equal to mine, not half. Her word in court is not automatically deemed less than a man's, and if she's raped, the burden isn't on her to explain why she started it and allowed it to happen.

And even though I find it appalling that not only is this man and seriously deranged young girl are getting married, you won't have to worry about me hijacking a plane and crashing it into a skyscraper in order to illustrate how I hate America or the West and the values of the people that live there. I won't be chopping anyone's heads off, I won't be pulling out an Uzi and shooting up editors of a rag-mag like The New Yorker. I won't try and smuggle a bomb inside my underwear to blow up a plane.

That's the Muslim way. A "peaceful, moderate" Muslim is just a Muslim who hasn't killed anybody yet.

Not that I'm exactly encouraging daddy-daughter sex and matrimony but....

...if they really do go along with it, why reveal it? Is it something the rest of the word has to know, given the taboo associated with it?

By the way, I can't listen to California Dreaming anymore without simultaneously thinking of an incestuous affair between one of the band members and his own daughter too.

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

Her testimony in court is equal to mine, not half. Her word in court is not automatically deemed less than a man's, and if she's raped, the burden isn't on her to explain why she started it and allowed it to happen.

*snort*

So I guess that is why, whenever there is a regiment of women who accuse a famous man of rape, there is still a significant portion of people who choose to believe the man?[/quote]

Salomé wrote:

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

Her testimony in court is equal to mine, not half. Her word in court is not automatically deemed less than a man's, and if she's raped, the burden isn't on her to explain why she started it and allowed it to happen.

*snort*

So I guess that is why, whenever there is a regiment of women who accuse a famous man of rape, there is still a significant portion of people who choose to believe the man?

Be reasonable, Oppers. Innocent until proven guilty.

That's why forensic evidence is so important. Otherwise, it's just one person's word against another and that can go either way.  That said, many women in England are now making allegations against men 30 or 40 or so years after an alleged crime took place.

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

[I] ended up being the one who is criticized as intolerant, fascist, and "fundamentalist".

I'm suggesting it's none of our business what people in a consensual adult relationship get up to.

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

A "peaceful, moderate" Muslim is just a Muslim who hasn't killed anybody yet.

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

[I] ended up being the one who is criticized as intolerant

Salomé wrote:

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

Her testimony in court is equal to mine, not half. Her word in court is not automatically deemed less than a man's, and if she's raped, the burden isn't on her to explain why she started it and allowed it to happen.

*snort*

So I guess that is why, whenever there is a regiment of women who accuse a famous man of rape, there is still a significant portion of people who choose to believe the man?

You're comparing apples to oranges. At least in the United States these women have a chance of being heard and believed; the judicial system is not weighted against the woman as it is in Saudi Arabia or in any place where Sharia law is applicable.

You're always going to have people who can't believe the truth about something that happened, no matter how hideous it is, no matter how many facts come out, no matter how many women come forward. If you're referring to Bill Cosby or Bill Clinton, I happen to think they're both rapists and should be exiled from public life.

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

A "peaceful, moderate" Muslim is just a Muslim who hasn't killed anybody yet.

Yeah, that's pretty fucked up. Of course, that's what happens when people like Rupert Murdoch keep spreading such propaganda. At least we have Aziz Ansari.

Erica Ambler wrote:

Salomé wrote:

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

Her testimony in court is equal to mine, not half. Her word in court is not automatically deemed less than a man's, and if she's raped, the burden isn't on her to explain why she started it and allowed it to happen.

*snort*

So I guess that is why, whenever there is a regiment of women who accuse a famous man of rape, there is still a significant portion of people who choose to believe the man?

Be reasonable, Oppers. Innocent until proven guilty.

That's why forensic evidence is so important. Otherwise, it's just one person's word against another and that can go either way.  That said, many women in England are now making allegations against men 30 or 40 or so years after an alleged crime took place.

How many of them have successfully secured a conviction?

Forensic evidence in a rape case will rarely be 100% conclusive, especially in cases where the rapist is a friend or acquaintance.
If the rapist claims consensual intercourse then it's back to being his word against hers.
Even if there are signs of violence, he could just claim it was rough sex.

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

That's the Muslim way. A "peaceful, moderate" Muslim is just a Muslim who hasn't killed anybody yet.

Nailed it.

Jack Wade wrote:

Gravity's Silhouette wrote:

That's the Muslim way. A "peaceful, moderate" Muslim is just a Muslim who hasn't killed anybody yet.

Nailed it.

Could say the same of anyone, though.

You certainly could. For instance, a "peaceful, moderate" Christian is just a Christian who hasn't blown up an abortion clinic or been convicted of a heinous sex crime yet.

Cherry-picking is easy. Just ask the producers of FOX News or MSNBC.