Problem Members

M wrote:

Thirteen complaints in my inbox and two from Forumotion themselves, among them constant allegations of racism and offensive/inflammatory content tell their own story. It's not worth the risk of his presence if it causes good members to leave and gets us in trouble with our forum hosts.

Quite, but it's not like he hadn't been a nuisance for like, an eternity...

There comes a point when enough's enough, Salomoppers.

x

j7 was brought over here to post titty pictures, and titty pictures only.

He couldn't carry out this simple directive, so he had to be... how you say... eliminated.

I'm still pretty much convinced he wasn't a "real" person, but rather an elaborate joke that was never funny and got increasingly tiresome.

x

I maintain the tragedy is that j7 is all too real a person.

Or thing. A failed experiment.

I kinda enjoyed supplying j7wild with sample pictures of his favourite porn model that were difficult, if not impossible to find, and then sending him off to find them if he can.

Knowing there's a 99% chance he never would...

How I got them cannot be discussed on a kid friendly board.... :face:

Mrs Aural Sects wrote:

I kinda enjoyed supplying j7wild with sample pictures of his favourite porn model that were difficult, if not impossible to find, and then sending him off to find them if he can.

Knowing there's a 99% chance he never would...

How I got them cannot be discussed on a kid friendly board.... :face:

Enabling his addiction... :evil:

Too bad jwild's not on BritCare. He could get a tax-payer funded trip to a brothel in the Netherlands.

Bumping this thread to say I found the video from which the GIF posted in this thread was created.

haha

Anyone think the point of the ban has been made and should be lifted?

To the chorus of nay-sayers, tell it to my ass....

I'll try but I distract easily

Addressed to Dog's ass:

With the current software at least, I can't lift bans. I typed in 28 days, and I have no way of reversing that. The slightest infraction by j7wild thereafter will result in a permanent ban.

Sharky wrote:

Addressed to Dog's ass:

With the current software at least, I can't lift bans. I typed in 28 days, and I have no way of reversing that. The slightest infraction by j7wild thereafter will result in a permanent ban.

I did wonder how these bans are set. Reminds of a timelock safe. Guess our power is that limited.

Mrs Aural Sects wrote:

Anyone think the point of the ban has been made and should be lifted?

To the chorus of nay-sayers, tell it to my ass....

There are several things I'd like to say to your ass, all of them concluding with an exclamation point. jWild, however, would not be part of the conversation.

:*h*:

Sharky wrote:

Addressed to Dog's ass:

With the current software at least, I can't lift bans. I typed in 28 days, and I have no way of reversing that. The slightest infraction by j7wild thereafter will result in a permanent ban.

Glad to hear we can continue enjoying the peace until May 8th :) .

Mrs Aural Sects wrote:

Anyone think the point of the ban has been made and should be lifted?

You let your maternal instincts get the better of you.

The ultimate question.

I'm wondering if what I said elsewhere was too generous. But two weeks...give him time to run the rope around his neck OR Ambler's return.

Thus...two weeks

I'm probably in the very tiny minority that feels sorry he was banned and a bit of sympathy for him...I would've at least provided him with access to some high-quality adult sites to pass the time.

Next time, if anyone wants to ban him, let me talk with him first. We got along well, including in pm....

J7 has no filter from brain to keyboard, so it might be even shorter than that.

Once he figures it out, he'll go out in a blaze of glory; leaving a trail of random new release threats and photo's of scantily clad models in his wake.

I'm sure j7 has his fill and then some of adult sites judging by the unlimited amount of resources he had. Providing him with more adult sites would be giving matches to a pyromaniac :)

And what Tubes said.

Mrs Aural Sects wrote:

I'm probably in the very tiny minority that feels sorry he was banned and a bit of sympathy for him...I would've at least provided him with access to some high-quality adult sites to pass the time.

If only Napoleon had a internet connection and a year's subscription to Bang Bros in Elba...